Thanks for the payment. (y)
no e-mails ever arrive... now I have problem with security lock e-mail.
Lol, a host with main income from Google Adsense (And he confirms it proudly), server4you dedicated servers for network (Dirty cheap), XFS script with pre-made template and LOT of bugs, i can resume all this in one word: UNPROFESSIONAL.
Good luck boys, this host will be down in less than 6 months (With this business pattern)
Lol, a host with main income from Google Adsense (And he confirms it proudly), server4you dedicated servers for network (Dirty cheap), XFS script with pre-made template and LOT of bugs, i can resume all this in one word: UNPROFESSIONAL.
Good luck boys, this host will be down in less than 6 months (With this business pattern)
Lol, a host with main income from Google Adsense (And he confirms it proudly), server4you dedicated servers for network (Dirty cheap), XFS script with pre-made template and LOT of bugs, i can resume all this in one word: UNPROFESSIONAL.
Good luck boys, this host will be down in less than 6 months (With this business pattern)
As I said, they will close soon :facepalm: like Anysend, UploadSat
I think host owner may be UploadSat, FilesFrog who got banned here
Don't throw dirt without anything to back it up with.
I'm giving them a chance. They count 100% and I'm sure they pay, too.
Do you pay by payza now? btw thanks for your 2 payments instantly on paypal
You don't reply to my PM so I have to write here so everyone knows...
You counted my United Kingdom traffic as last tier (0.002$) not how you've written in your tiers - UK 1st tier 0.005$
I've sent you proof pic and you've seen it I know but no reply or fix...
Scam host cheating workers?
Edit: and some U.S. traffic is constantly not counted (0.000$)...
Will provide screenshot proofs later...
Very angry atm.
Thank You Very Much For You Reply Man
Umm, I don't understand those screenshots at all..
First of all, on the U.S. screenshot those odd IM00... zips aren't mine, and judging by their name, it's not something my downloader is even interested in, but sure, I can show him that screenshot and ask.
Regardless though if he did download allegedly other user's files, why do I have to suffer?
This system appears very tricky honestly. You're basically saying that 10 downloads per IP count if and only if that user doesn't download something else from your host. You should clarify this in your original post.
As for GB... I can't understand that either.
Are you saying that because all are my files, it somehow overturns the 10 downloads per IP rule and EVERYTHING is counted just at 0.002 rate? Yet again something you should clarify in the OP.
And I don't understand this 25. Are you counting 25 for both days? Because for this current day it's exactly 10 (it's easy to observe for me because I rar'ed my files in bulks of 10) and yet it's only 0.002 for each
download, not 0.005 as it should.
Very tricky stuff.
Edit: I'm having gradually more downloads per day and more 0.000$ in report.... Figured, even small cents are shaved.
"We count up to 10 downloads per ip/24 hours, that is the base line. And for your case, it is also running good, because your referral IP downloader come and download other resource, that will also counts IP downloads +1.
Also it is something not happening normally that your IP downloading other users' resource, which we will do more research in it."
Those files weren't downloaded by my "referral IP downloader" (not that I even have any refs atm :D), your site isn't even known with the crowd that frequents my site. So I find it very hard to believe that whilst perusing
my files, he suddenly - out of nowhere - found someone else's file, provocatively entitled "FlaredSkirt.zip" and started to download this urgently. Furthermore, I'm fairly certain that wasn't even his IP (I do have IPs logged in
WP, ya know), but I can't confirm that 100% because I do have other U.S. downloaders. But I'll make a comment with your picture and ask if someone of them indeed downloaded those odd files. Should be fun to read the replies
and come back here. It truly was a miscalculation in your part to put obvious porn titles amongst my files. Warez downloading crowd and porn crowd doesn't mix :D
"For the rules, it means we count up to 10 times per ip, and that is for tier 1 IP. So if your ip is tier 2 or lower, we will count your earning to the same amount of 10 times for tier 2, which means will pay you up to 0.05 usd. For the numbers is only showing the average earning for that IP."
Most my IPs so far have all been Tier 1 with the exception of downloaders from EU (what's that about?) and HU. But I understand why those can be/are 0.002 per pop. But everything else has been US and GB and what you're doing
is decreasing U.S. earnings (making a lot of them 0.000) and cutting all - all - the GB earnings half (0.005 / 2 = ~0.0025 (rounded downward :D).
"Also, again same from your last question, we are not shaving any, there are stable uploaders in fileinz.com getting paid every day, and no complain from them at all, hope you can find us more reliable first. We also hope you can enjoy the uploading here, truely."
Didn't you, in this same thread, claim that you're been in business a month only? Hence, stable is a quite relative term, but of course, I wouldn't put it past you. It can very well be.
But my first impressions aren't good, unfortunately. There has been hints in this thread about your ties with UploadSat. While I don't really give them credit (then again, who knows), that site at least counted every single download
even if the rates were shite.
You're trying to make a buck out of less-than-marginal earnings, cents that no one in their right mind even dares to refer to as cents.
But it's fine, you know. I'll keep going some more and report back what I see. And I'll also take an open question to my downloaders as to who downloaded the controversial "FlaredSkirt.zip".
But we both know the answer to that one now, don't we?
Edit: A final nugget to chew on. Quite honestly, it's the first ever time I hear that when a user downloads files from two different users on the SAME filehost, the earnings of one of the uploader's suffer as a result. Man, you must be scared for your business when that gets out, mustn't you? I mean, by that logic, the less uploaders you have and the less popular your site is, the better, right? Oh boy, you're
spouting such gold that would even make Uploaded proud.