That's always true. First, your hosts live longer other hosts, over 3 years. Second, he pays every week. Third, why your hosts always be used on all sites ?? OK.
Not true. First, I use at least 3 different hosts, which are online at least as long as Vodlocker, some even longer, and with some small exceptions they have always been reliable and fully functional. Like I said, Vodlocker used to be one my fav hosts, because it is/was relatively stable.
Second, they pay when account user gains enough money to request payout, for one person it will be week, for other month and so on.
If you meant, that they realize payment weekly, then I can agree with that. Correction, they used to, until July this year.
But again, most hosts do that. Some even pay daily.
Third argument...lol! You mean on all sites in web? That would be a true Vodlocker flood! Unless you meant all (popular) video file sharing websites. Then I must disagree. I regularly visit at least 2 video sharing international websites on which posting Vodlocker and Vidbull links is officially forbidden.
My personal arguments for Vodlocker being a good file host (so far) are as follows:
1. Unlimited storage plus no files deletion, which is extremely important for people who want to have sort of stable data base with video files.
2. Small size of converted files, which allows to stream videos even if you don't have a very fast internet connection.
3. Regular payments (so far) and communicative admin/staff members (whoever sits there and reads our emails).
I think I named all pros. The list of cons would be much, much longer, but I will leave it for some other time.
