{Pay Per Download} VS {Pay Per Sale}

[sSKKa]

=) {Pay Per Download} VS {Pay Per Sale} =)

Please drop your comments and thoughts about pay per sale is best or pay per download is much better for supporting uploaders and dont forget to let us know which one option are you using?

​

 

[sSKKa]

currently em prefer PPD

 

[bxflow]

Well if you have a way to get users to buy then go with sales but if not stick to download

 

[vizoomer]

PPD if i'm a uploader who is real popular ....

PPS if i have a site which is real popular ...

currently it's none of the above for me .. so yea both are cool for me :P

 

[-zAAz-]

new filehost = PPS
old = PPD

 

[downloadsmasti]

i prefer PPD

 

[Daniel]

Pay per sale is good if you're running a website with much traffic.

 

[masterb56]

Yeah to maximize pay per sale, you need to have your own website

 

[Daniel]

Moved to the File Hosts forum.

 

[XForce!]

Pay Per Download is best!

 

[carlosxere]

PPD The Best

 

[ps03]

pps : )
filesonic doesn't have alot of downloads!!

 

[petertouch]

PPS for me.

 

[robinex]

PPD best. because only a little people buy premium :S

 

[automan]

Well I own site with 10,000 visitors. I still prefer PPD. Not much people buy premium from my site :P

 

[george101]

PPS is the best if your files are unique or if you have a huge site full of filesonic links

 

[Veer]

PPS is good if you don't upload much and have a particular dedicated filehost links shared site.

Else PPD is good for both high traffic site and low traffic site.

 

[Sahibaan]

may be both but i like ppd

 

[load-2u6969]

PPD if i'm a uploader who is real popular ....

PPS if i have a site which is real popular ...

 

[bluestar89]

new host = PPS
Old host = PPD