@ hdhieu: Got it. Submitted to techs
@RickyFS
i have a free account of fileserve i cant remote upload from hotfile
HF TO FS REMOTE UPLOAD IS NOT POSSSIBLE ??
HF to FS hasn't worked for a very long time. HF runs the very unique policy of banning every other host out there to save bandwidth costs. What was their quote again? Don't follow the imitators follow the creators? Sure, it is creative to block all other competitors
We cannot reverse it as it has already gone into the payment scheme. I tell people who wants bank wire this as well; if they press Payout there's no turning back.
@ hdhieu: Minimum payout: 1000 USD.
We do it manually. User is in charge of the fees for this (since we're pulling a cooperation between techs and accountants together [using their time]). Usually takes 3-5 Business days. We do it in and around mass-payments (so basically either Tues, Wednesday or Thursday)
HF to FS hasn't worked for a very long time. HF runs the very unique policy of banning every other host out there to save bandwidth costs. What was their quote again? Don't follow the imitators follow the creators? Sure, it is creative to block all other competitors
We have informed Filesonic that their IPs have been whitelisted, but if they are unable to control their remote servers to the limitations we have set for them, it is bottom line; not our problem.Contrary to your belief that we have blocked out all the other host, I would certainly like to disagree. We have never put a block/stop to other servers unless it looked like a malicious attack: How would your system cope if 1 server was trying to grab 1000s of links? How would you consider such actions Versus giving 1000s of free users THEIR download capability? So the trade-off here is that the other host should try to maintain some sort of "standard of operation" instead of trying to jeopardize our servers and piss off their users (uploaders). First and foremost, we are here to serve the users, not our competitors.